project: fail examples

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail examples 1.00
is fail 0.83
fail mckinsey 0.83
fail 0.83
fail statistics 0.78
fail pdf 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restoration, fail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(restoration, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(restoration, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, fail examples)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(project, fail mckinsey)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(project, fail mckinsey)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(project, fail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, is fail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, is fail)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, is fail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail statistics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, fail statistics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail statistics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, fail pdf)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail pdf)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fail pdf)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(project, fail mckinsey)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fail)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(project, is fail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fail pdf)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(project, fail statistics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail examples)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(project, fail examples)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail examples) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(restoration, fail)