pun: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.60
, joke
Weight: 0.50
, form
Weight: 0.48
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.35
, cliche
Weight: 0.33
, shit
Weight: 0.33
, lyric
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality worst 0.80
has quality evil 0.78
has quality definition 0.76
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cliche, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(cliche, has quality evil)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cliche, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cliche, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fart, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fart, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(cliche, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cliche, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(pun, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pun, has quality evil)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pun, has quality questions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pun, has quality worst)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pun, has quality questions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(pun, has quality definition)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pun, has quality definition)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pun, has quality questions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(pun, has quality definition)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pun, has quality evil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality evil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pun, has quality evil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality worst)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pun, has quality worst)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pun, has quality worst)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality questions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pun, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cliche, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cliche, has quality evil)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fart, has quality good)