pun: has quality worst

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.60
, joke
Weight: 0.50
, form
Weight: 0.48
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.35
, cliche
Weight: 0.33
, shit
Weight: 0.33
, lyric
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worst 1.00
has quality good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cliche, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fart, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(cliche, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cliche, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(fart, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fart, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pun, has quality worst)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(pun, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pun, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pun, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality worst)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pun, has quality worst)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cliche, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pun, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fart, has quality good)