putter: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents golf club
Weight: 0.67
, club
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.50
, disc
Weight: 0.50
Siblings golf ball
Weight: 0.37
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.34
, golfer
Weight: 0.33
, football player
Weight: 0.32
, wedge
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
is worth 2018 0.93
has quality better 0.83
is net worth 2018 0.81
is net worth 0.81
has quality price 0.81
is value 0.79
value 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(golf club, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(putter, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(club, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(putter, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(club, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(golf club, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(golf club, has quality worth)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(club, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(golf club, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(putter, has quality worth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(club, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(putter, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(golf ball, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(golf ball, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(putter, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(putter, is worth 2018)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(putter, is worth 2018)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(putter, is net worth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(putter, is net worth 2018)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality better)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(putter, is net worth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(putter, is net worth 2018)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality price)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(putter, is value)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(putter, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(putter, has quality price)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(putter, value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(putter, is value)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(putter, value)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(putter, is worth 2018)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(putter, is net worth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(putter, is net worth 2018)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(putter, has quality price)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(putter, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(putter, value)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(putter, is value)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(putter, is worth 2018)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(putter, is net worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(putter, has quality price)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(putter, is net worth 2018)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(putter, value)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(putter, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(putter, is value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(putter, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(club, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golf ball, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(club, has quality worth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(putter, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(golf club, has quality worth)