quality: be bad on twitter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents standard
Weight: 0.66
, value
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.62
, discipline
Weight: 0.62
, consideration
Weight: 0.61
Siblings integrity
Weight: 0.71
, speed
Weight: 0.70
, accuracy
Weight: 0.68
, honesty
Weight: 0.67
, creativity
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad on twitter 1.00
go down on twitter 0.94
be bad on facebook 0.89
be poor on facebook 0.85
go down on facebook 0.82
be on netflix bad 0.77
be bad on snapchat 0.75
be bad on instagram 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be bad on twitter)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on facebook)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be bad on facebook)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be poor on facebook)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be poor on facebook)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on facebook)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(quality, go down on facebook)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on facebook)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(quality, go down on twitter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be on netflix bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be on netflix bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(quality, be on netflix bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(quality, go down on facebook)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(quality, be poor on facebook)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(quality, be poor on facebook)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(quality, be on netflix bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(quality, go down on twitter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on instagram)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on snapchat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(quality, go down on facebook)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(quality, go down on facebook)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(quality, go down on twitter)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(quality, go down on twitter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on twitter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(quality, be bad on twitter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on twitter)