quality: go down on twitter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents standard
Weight: 0.66
, value
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.62
, discipline
Weight: 0.62
, consideration
Weight: 0.61
Siblings integrity
Weight: 0.71
, speed
Weight: 0.70
, accuracy
Weight: 0.68
, honesty
Weight: 0.67
, creativity
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
go down on twitter 1.00
be bad on twitter 0.94
go down on facebook 0.91
be bad on facebook 0.84
be poor on facebook 0.81
go down on snapchat 0.80
go down on instagram 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(quality, go down on twitter)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on twitter)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be bad on twitter)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on twitter)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on twitter)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(quality, go down on facebook)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(quality, go down on facebook)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be bad on facebook)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(quality, go down on facebook)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be bad on facebook)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(quality, be bad on facebook)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(quality, be poor on facebook)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(quality, be poor on facebook)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(quality, be bad on facebook)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(quality, go down on facebook)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(quality, go down on instagram)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(quality, be poor on facebook)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(quality, go down on snapchat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(quality, be poor on facebook)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(quality, go down on instagram)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(quality, go down on instagram)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(quality, go down on snapchat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(quality, go down on snapchat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(quality, go down on instagram)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(quality, go down on snapchat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(quality, go down on twitter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(quality, go down on twitter)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(quality, go down on twitter)