queensland: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, country
Weight: 0.51
, australia
Weight: 0.47
, event
Weight: 0.46
Siblings tasmania
Weight: 0.33
, brisbane
Weight: 0.33
, adelaide
Weight: 0.33
, western australia
Weight: 0.33
, idaho
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
is best state 0.80
has state jobs 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(idaho, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tasmania, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(idaho, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(idaho, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(tasmania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tasmania, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tasmania, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tasmania, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(queensland, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(queensland, is best state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state jobs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(queensland, has state jobs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(queensland, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(queensland, has state jobs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(queensland, is best state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(queensland, has state jobs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(queensland, is best state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(queensland, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(idaho, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(tasmania, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(queensland, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(tasmania, has state jobs)