question: be important in research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.66
, answer
Weight: 0.65
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.66
, big bang
Weight: 0.65
, argument
Weight: 0.62
, penis
Weight: 0.59
, rumor
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in research 1.00
be important in subjects research 0.86
be important in human subjects research 0.84
be important in science 0.82
be important in life science 0.80
be important for development meritnation 0.80
be important for development 0.80
be important to gilgamesh 0.78
be important in business 0.76
help further science investigations 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(consideration, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(question, be important in research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(consideration, be important in subjects research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(question, be important in research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(consideration, be important in human subjects research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(question, be important in research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(question, be important in research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(question, be important in research)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(question, be important in research)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(question, be important in research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(consideration, be important in research)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(consideration, be important in subjects research)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(consideration, be important in human subjects research)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(consideration, be important in research)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(consideration, be important in human subjects research)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(consideration, be important in subjects research)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(consideration, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(question, be important in research)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(consideration, be important in subjects research)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(question, be important in research)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(consideration, be important in human subjects research)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(question, be important in research)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(question, be important in research)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(question, be important in research)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(question, be important in research)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(question, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fairness, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(question, be important in research)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(question, be important in science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(question, be important in science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(question, be important in life science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(question, be important in life science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(question, be important in science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(question, be important in life science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(question, help further science investigations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(question, help further science investigations)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(question, help further science investigations)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(question, help further science investigations)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in life science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(question, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in research)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in subjects research)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in human subjects research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in research)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in subjects research)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(consideration, be important in human subjects research)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(question, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)