rabbit: has state pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.73
, rodent
Weight: 0.69
, pet
Weight: 0.67
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.74
, lizard
Weight: 0.39
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.39
, cat
Weight: 0.38
, monkey
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pets 1.00
be pets 0.95
be as pets 0.95
make pets 0.93
is good pets 0.93
is bad pets 0.93
is best pets 0.91
make good pets 0.90
make popular pets 0.90
be kept as pets 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cat, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(cat, make pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cat, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, has state pets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(cat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(cat, make pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rabbit, has state pets)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rabbit, make pets)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, is good pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rabbit, make pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(rabbit, is good pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rabbit, make pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rabbit, is good pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, make pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(cat, make pets)