guinea pig: is good pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rabbit
Weight: 0.74
, pig
Weight: 0.73
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, pet
Weight: 0.71
Siblings small dog
Weight: 0.66
, hamster
Weight: 0.58
, pigeon
Weight: 0.56
, parrot
Weight: 0.54
, chinchilla
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pets 1.00
is bad pets 0.98
make good pets 0.98
make pets 0.95
has state pets 0.93
act around cats 0.83
used for animals 0.82
act around dogs 0.80
love much rabbits 0.79
live with rabbits 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rabbit, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rabbit, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rabbit, make pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rabbit, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pig, has state pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rabbit, make pets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pig, has state pets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, make pets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, make pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hamster, has state pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hamster, make good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(rabbit, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rabbit, make pets)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rabbit, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(pig, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chinchilla, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hamster, make pets)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(hamster, make pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hamster, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hamster, make good pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(chinchilla, make pets)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chinchilla, make pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(parrot, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(parrot, has state pets)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(guinea pig, is good pets)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, has state pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(guinea pig, used for animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(guinea pig, used for animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(guinea pig, has state pets)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pig, has state pets)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rabbit, make pets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, is good pets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(chinchilla, make pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hamster, make pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chinchilla, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chinchilla, is good pets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(parrot, has state pets)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, is good pets)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rabbit, make pets)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pig, has state pets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(guinea pig, is good pets)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pets)