radio telescope: be useful in modern astronomy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.63
, technology
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.43
Siblings telescope
Weight: 0.39
, radio receiver
Weight: 0.34
, debt instrument
Weight: 0.34
, magnetic compass
Weight: 0.34
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in modern astronomy 1.00
be useful in astronomy 0.97
be important in astronomy 0.95
be considered telescopes 0.78
be different from keck telescopes 0.78
use than telescopes 0.77
be better than telescopes 0.77
be used by astronomers 0.77
be considered dependable telescopes 0.77
be better than optical telescopes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(telescope, be useful in astronomy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(telescope, be useful in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(telescope, be important in astronomy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(telescope, be important in astronomy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be used by astronomers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be used by astronomers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be considered dependable telescopes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be used by astronomers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be considered dependable telescopes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, use than telescopes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be important in astronomy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be considered dependable telescopes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be different from keck telescopes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than telescopes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be considered dependable telescopes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be better than optical telescopes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be used by astronomers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be considered telescopes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, use than telescopes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(telescope, be useful in astronomy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(radio telescope, be useful in modern astronomy)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(telescope, be important in astronomy)