raising: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents subject
Weight: 0.51
, matter
Weight: 0.49
, stage
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.45
, event
Weight: 0.41
Siblings raise
Weight: 0.32
, public speaking
Weight: 0.30
, drawing
Weight: 0.30
, talking
Weight: 0.29
, financing
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
be bad for economy 0.82
has quality bad 0.80
is good bad idea 0.79
be bad for businesses 0.78
be good thing do 0.77
is good thing 0.77
has quality good 0.77
is bad idea 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(raise, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(drawing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(drawing, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(financing, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(financing, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(financing, is bad idea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(financing, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(financing, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(raise, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(raise, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(financing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(financing, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(financing, is bad idea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(financing, is bad idea)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(drawing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(drawing, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(drawing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(drawing, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(raising, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(raising, be bad for economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(raising, be bad for economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for businesses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(raising, be bad for businesses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(raising, be bad for businesses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(raising, is good bad idea)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(raising, is good bad idea)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(raising, is good bad idea)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(raising, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(raising, is bad idea)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(raising, is bad idea)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(raising, is bad idea)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(raising, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(raising, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(raising, be bad for economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(raising, be bad for businesses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(raising, is bad idea)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(raising, is good bad idea)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(raising, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(raising, is good thing)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(raising, be good thing do)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(raising, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raising, is good thing)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(raising, be good thing do)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(raising, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(raising, is good thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(raising, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(raising, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(raising, be good thing do)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(raising, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(raising, be good thing do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(raising, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(raise, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(drawing, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(financing, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(financing, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(drawing, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(raising, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(financing, is bad idea)