rap music: has quality influence

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, song
Weight: 0.64
, rapper
Weight: 0.59
, pop music
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings country music
Weight: 0.38
, love song
Weight: 0.37
, classical music
Weight: 0.37
, rap
Weight: 0.37
, loud music
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality influence 1.00
is good influence 0.92
is bad influence 0.91
is negative influence 0.87
have positive impact on youth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality influence)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rap, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rap, is bad influence)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(rap music, has quality influence)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is bad influence)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is good influence)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is negative influence)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(rap music, is bad influence)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(rap music, is negative influence)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(rap music, is good influence)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rap music, have positive impact on youth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rap music, have positive impact on youth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rap music, is bad influence)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rap music, is negative influence)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rap music, is good influence)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(rap music, have positive impact on youth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rap music, is negative influence)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rap music, is bad influence)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rap music, is good influence)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rap music, have positive impact on youth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality influence)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rap, has quality influence)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rap, is bad influence)