rap: has quality influence

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents style
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, form
Weight: 0.54
, influence
Weight: 0.53
, music
Weight: 0.51
Siblings rap music
Weight: 0.37
, rock music
Weight: 0.34
, punk rock
Weight: 0.34
, pop music
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality influence 1.00
is bad influence 0.91
influence people to tag 0.77
has quality good 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rap, has quality influence)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rap, has quality influence)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rap, has quality influence)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rap, has quality influence)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(influence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rap, has quality influence)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(influence, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(style, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(music, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(style, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(influence, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(music, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is bad influence)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rock music, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pop music, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality influence)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality influence)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality influence)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality influence)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(influence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality influence)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(rap music, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality influence)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(rap music, is bad influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rap music, is bad influence)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rap music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pop music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pop music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(pop music, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rock music, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rap music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rap music, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rock music, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rock music, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rap, has quality influence)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rap, influence people to tag)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(rap, is bad influence)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(rap, influence people to tag)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(rap, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rap, is bad influence)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rap, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rap, is bad influence)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rap, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rap, influence people to tag)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rap, influence people to tag)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rap, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rap, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rap, has quality influence)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality influence)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rap music, is bad influence)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rap music, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pop music, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rock music, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(music, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rap, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(music, has quality good)