rat: has state pest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pest 1.00
has state pests 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cockroach, has state pests)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cockroach, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cockroach, has state pests)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rat, has state pest)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rat, has state pests)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rat, has state pests)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rat, has state pests)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rat, has state pest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cockroach, has state pests)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pest)