rat: has state pests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pests 1.00
has state pest 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cockroach, has state pests)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cockroach, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cockroach, has state pests)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(rat, has state pests)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rat, has state pest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rat, has state pest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rat, has state pest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rat, has state pests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cockroach, has state pests)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pest)