rat: jump back on rats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
jump back on rats 1.00
jump back on other rats 0.99
be different to rats 0.89
be called rats 0.88
eat rats 0.88
be different to normal rats 0.85
differ from rats 0.84
differ from black rats 0.84
kill mice 0.81
be called rodents 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(rat, jump back on rats)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rat, differ from rats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rat, eat rats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rat, eat rats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(rat, eat rats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rat, be different to rats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, be called rats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(rat, differ from rats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rat, be called rodents)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(rat, eat rats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rat, kill mice)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rat, be called rats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rat, be different to rats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rat, be called rodents)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(rat, differ from rats)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, kill mice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rat, be called rats)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rat, be different to rats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rat, kill mice)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(rat, kill mice)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(rat, be called rodents)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, be called rats)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rat, be different to rats)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rat, be called rodents)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(rat, differ from rats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rat, jump back on rats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rat, jump back on rats)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rat, jump back on rats)