rat: make pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
make pets 1.00
make good pets 0.97
make bad pets 0.97
be as pets 0.96
is good pets 0.95
is bad pets 0.94
has state pets 0.93
is best pets 0.93
is good pet 0.86
be afraid of cats 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, make pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rabbit, make pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rabbit, is good pets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(rat, make pets)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(rat, be afraid of cats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(rat, be afraid of cats)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rat, be afraid of cats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rat, be as pets)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rat, make pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rat, make pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rabbit, make pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, is good pets)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rat, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pets)