rat: be as pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as pets 1.00
make pets 0.96
is good pets 0.96
is bad pets 0.95
has state pets 0.95
is best pets 0.94
make good pets 0.94
make bad pets 0.93
is good pet 0.87
has state pet 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, make pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rabbit, make pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rabbit, is good pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rat, be as pets)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rat, make pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(rat, make pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rat, has state pets)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rat, has state pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(rat, make pets)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rat, has state pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rat, has state pet)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rat, has state pet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rat, has state pet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rat, make pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rat, be as pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rat, be as pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rabbit, make pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, is good pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rat, be as pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pets)