rat: has state pet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state pet 1.00
is good pet 0.94
has state pets 0.91
be found at pet store 0.85
be as pets 0.85
is good pets 0.83
make pets 0.83
is bad pets 0.83
is best pets 0.83
make bad pets 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, make pets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(rabbit, has state pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has state pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(rabbit, make pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rabbit, make pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(rabbit, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(rabbit, is good pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rat, has state pet)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rat, has state pets)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rat, has state pets)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rat, has state pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rat, be as pets)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rat, be as pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(rat, make pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(rat, make pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(rat, be as pets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(rat, make pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rat, be as pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rat, make pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rat, has state pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rabbit, make pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rat, has state pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(rabbit, is good pets)