ratio: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
is related 0.99
be related to number 0.86
be related to area 0.85
be related to numbers 0.81
be related use examples 0.78
be related to prime number 0.78
be related in math 0.77
is inversely related 0.76
be inversely related to investment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(variable, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ratio, be related)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ratio, be related)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(factor, be related to prime number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ratio, be related)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(factor, be related in math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ratio, be related)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ratio, be related)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(variable, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to number)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to numbers)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related in math)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(variable, be related)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to prime number)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to numbers)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be inversely related to investment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rate, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, is inversely related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(variable, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ratio, be related)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ratio, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ratio, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(factor, be related to prime number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ratio, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ratio, be related)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rate, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rate, be related)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(interest rate, is inversely related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(interest rate, is inversely related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(interest rate, be inversely related to investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be inversely related to investment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ratio, be related)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ratio, is related)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ratio, is related)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(ratio, is related)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ratio, is related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(ratio, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(factor, be related to numbers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(interest rate, be inversely related to investment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rate, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(interest rate, is inversely related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(variable, be related)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(ratio, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(factor, be related to numbers)
...