realtor: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents professional
Weight: 0.64
, business people
Weight: 0.60
, website
Weight: 0.59
, site
Weight: 0.57
, customer
Weight: 0.56
Siblings appraiser
Weight: 0.34
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.34
, notary
Weight: 0.33
, banker
Weight: 0.33
, accountant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(real estate agent, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(accountant, get paid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(real estate agent, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, is paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(realtor, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(realtor, is paid)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(realtor, is paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(realtor, is paid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(realtor, is paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(realtor, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(realtor, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate agent, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(real estate agent, is paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(realtor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(accountant, get paid)