recorder: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	wind instrument Weight: 0.67 , instrument Weight: 0.65 , musical instrument Weight: 0.63 , woodwind instrument Weight: 0.63 , device Weight: 0.63
Siblings	percussion instrument Weight: 0.35 , laptop computer Weight: 0.34 , stringed instrument Weight: 0.34 , electronic device Weight: 0.34 , negotiable instrument Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
sound bad	0.79
is terrible	0.77
has quality questions	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(recorder, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(recorder, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(recorder, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(recorder, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(recorder, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(woodwind instrument, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(wind instrument, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(woodwind instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(recorder, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(wind instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(recorder, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(recorder, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(recorder, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(recorder, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(recorder, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(recorder, has quality good)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(recorder, has quality good)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(recorder, has quality good)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(recorder, sound bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(recorder, sound bad)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(recorder, sound bad)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(recorder, sound bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(recorder, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wind instrument, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(woodwind instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality questions)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wind instrument, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(recorder, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(woodwind instrument, has quality good)