recruiter: do phone interviews

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings staff sergeant
Weight: 0.51
, salesperson
Weight: 0.33
, counselor
Weight: 0.33
, family member
Weight: 0.33
, representative
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
do phone interviews 1.00
ask about interviews 0.92
ask about other interviews 0.91
use video interviews 0.90
use virtual interviews 0.83
interview 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(recruiter, do phone interviews)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, use video interviews)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(recruiter, use video interviews)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(recruiter, use video interviews)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(recruiter, interview)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(recruiter, use video interviews)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, use virtual interviews)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(recruiter, use virtual interviews)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(recruiter, use virtual interviews)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(recruiter, ask about other interviews)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(recruiter, interview)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(recruiter, interview)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(recruiter, ask about other interviews)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(recruiter, use virtual interviews)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, ask about other interviews)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(recruiter, ask about other interviews)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, interview)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, do phone interviews)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(recruiter, do phone interviews)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(recruiter, do phone interviews)