red fox: be problem in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in australia 1.00
be introduced australia 0.85
have in australia pests 0.82
be invasive species in australia 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(red fox, be problem in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red fox, have in australia pests)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(red fox, be introduced australia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(red fox, have in australia pests)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(red fox, be introduced australia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(red fox, be introduced australia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(red fox, have in australia pests)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be introduced australia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have in australia pests)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be problem in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(red fox, be problem in australia)