red fox: have in australia pests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have in australia pests 1.00
has state pests 0.88
be invasive species in australia 0.85
be problem in australia 0.82
be introduced australia 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fox, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red fox, have in australia pests)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fox, has state pests)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fox, has state pests)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fox, has state pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(red fox, have in australia pests)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(red fox, have in australia pests)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be problem in australia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state pests)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(red fox, has state pests)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(red fox, be problem in australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be introduced australia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(red fox, be introduced australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(red fox, has state pests)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red fox, has state pests)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red fox, be problem in australia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(red fox, be introduced australia)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(red fox, be problem in australia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(red fox, be introduced australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have in australia pests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red fox, have in australia pests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fox, has state pests)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red fox, have in australia pests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fox, has state pests)