red fox: have pointed noses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have pointed noses 1.00
have long pointed noses 0.98
have long noses 0.87
has physical part noses 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(red fox, have pointed noses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red fox, have pointed noses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(red fox, have pointed noses)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long pointed noses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long noses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(red fox, have long pointed noses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long pointed noses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, have long noses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(red fox, have long pointed noses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long noses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(red fox, have long noses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have pointed noses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(red fox, have pointed noses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(red fox, have pointed noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)