red fox: is invasive

Related concepts

Parents	fox Weight: 0.75 , animal Weight: 0.72 , arctic fox Weight: 0.71 , species Weight: 0.69 , mammal Weight: 0.67
Siblings	red squirrel Weight: 0.40 , gray fox Weight: 0.39 , red panda Weight: 0.38 , brown bear Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is invasive	1.00
is invasive species	0.94
be invasive species in australia	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(species, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(species, is invasive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(species, is invasive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(species, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(red fox, is invasive)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(red fox, is invasive species)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(species, is invasive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(red fox, is invasive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(species, is invasive)