red panda: live in rainforest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in rainforest 1.00
live in trees 0.80
live in himalayas 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, live in rainforest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(monkey, live in trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, live in rainforest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(monkey, live in trees)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, live in rainforest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(monkey, live in trees)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in rainforest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(monkey, live in trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(red panda, live in rainforest)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in trees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(red panda, live in trees)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in trees)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(red panda, live in trees)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(red panda, live in himalayas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red panda, live in himalayas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in rainforest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, live in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monkey, live in trees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monkey, live in trees)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(red panda, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)