red panda: live in himalayas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in himalayas 1.00
live in groups 0.82
live in trees 0.78
live in rainforest 0.78
live in china 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red panda, live in himalayas)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(monkey, live in trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red panda, live in himalayas)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(giant panda, live in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red panda, live in himalayas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(giant panda, live in china)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(monkey, live in trees)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, live in china)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(monkey, live in trees)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(monkey, live in trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(giant panda, live in china) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(red panda, live in himalayas)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in china)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(red panda, live in china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in china)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in groups)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in trees)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red panda, live in himalayas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(giant panda, live in china)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monkey, live in trees)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(giant panda, live in china)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monkey, live in trees)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(red panda, live in himalayas) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)