reef: be critical to biodiversity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, island
Weight: 0.58
, brand
Weight: 0.51
, beach
Weight: 0.49
Siblings great barrier reef
Weight: 0.82
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.36
, rhode island
Weight: 0.36
, staten island
Weight: 0.36
, long island
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be critical to biodiversity 1.00
be critical to biodiversity in oceans 0.95
have biodiversity 0.94
have high biodiversity 0.92
be important to environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(island, have high biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(island, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(island, have high biodiversity)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(island, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(island, have high biodiversity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(island, be important to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(island, have high biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(island, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(reef, be critical to biodiversity)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(reef, have biodiversity)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(reef, have biodiversity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(reef, have biodiversity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(reef, have high biodiversity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(reef, have high biodiversity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(island, be important to environment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(island, have high biodiversity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(island, be important to environment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(island, have high biodiversity)