reef: have high biodiversity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, island
Weight: 0.58
, brand
Weight: 0.51
, beach
Weight: 0.49
Siblings great barrier reef
Weight: 0.82
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.36
, rhode island
Weight: 0.36
, staten island
Weight: 0.36
, long island
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have high biodiversity 1.00
have biodiversity 0.97
be critical to biodiversity 0.92
be critical to biodiversity in oceans 0.90
have endemic species 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(island, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(reef, have high biodiversity)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(island, have endemic species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(reef, have high biodiversity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(island, have high biodiversity)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(island, have endemic species)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(island, have high biodiversity)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(island, have endemic species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(island, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(island, have endemic species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(reef, have high biodiversity)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(reef, have biodiversity)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(reef, have biodiversity)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(reef, have biodiversity)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(reef, have high biodiversity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(island, have endemic species)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(island, have high biodiversity)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(island, have high biodiversity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(reef, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(island, have endemic species)