refrigeration: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cold storage
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.61
, storage
Weight: 0.61
, application
Weight: 0.59
, sector
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cold water
Weight: 0.33
, cooking
Weight: 0.32
, cold turkey
Weight: 0.32
, household appliance
Weight: 0.32
, hvac
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
jobs 0.94
has state job 0.88
job 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sector, jobs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(refrigeration, has state jobs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(refrigeration, has state jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sector, jobs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sector, job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sector, jobs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sector, job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hvac, has state jobs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(hvac, jobs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hvac, has state job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(sector, jobs)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(refrigeration, has state jobs)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sector, job)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(refrigeration, has state jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(hvac, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hvac, has state jobs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(hvac, jobs)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hvac, jobs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hvac, has state job)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hvac, has state job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(refrigeration, has state jobs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(refrigeration, has state jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sector, jobs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sector, job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hvac, jobs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hvac, has state jobs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hvac, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(sector, jobs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(refrigeration, has state jobs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sector, job)