regulation: affect banking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.64
, protection
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.62
, prohibition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mandate
Weight: 0.65
, period
Weight: 0.59
, interpretation
Weight: 0.59
, regulator
Weight: 0.57
, legislation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect banking 1.00
be important in banking 0.95
be concerned about shadow banking 0.85
affect business 0.79
be in financial system 0.76
be important in finance 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(regulator, be concerned about shadow banking)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(legislation, affect business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(legislation, affect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(legislation, affect business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(regulator, be concerned about shadow banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(regulator, be concerned about shadow banking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(regulation, affect banking)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(regulation, be in financial system)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in finance)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be in financial system)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(regulation, be in financial system)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(regulation, be in financial system)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in banking)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in banking)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in finance)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(regulation, be important in finance)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in finance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(regulation, affect banking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(regulation, affect banking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(legislation, affect business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(regulation, affect banking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(regulator, be concerned about shadow banking)