relief: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, benefit
Weight: 0.58
, comfort
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
Siblings emergency
Weight: 0.31
, headache
Weight: 0.31
, ease
Weight: 0.31
, time zone
Weight: 0.31
, suffering
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worse 0.84
has quality services 0.80
has quality definition 0.76
get bad 0.76
has quality print 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(comfort, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(relief, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(comfort, has quality print)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(comfort, has quality print)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(emergency, has quality services)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(headache, has quality worse)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(suffering, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(time zone, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(comfort, has quality print) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(relief, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(time zone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(time zone, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(suffering, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(suffering, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(suffering, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(suffering, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(emergency, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(emergency, has quality services)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(headache, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(headache, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(relief, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(relief, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(comfort, has quality print)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(suffering, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(emergency, has quality services)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(suffering, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(time zone, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(headache, has quality worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(relief, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(comfort, has quality print)