rent: be high in city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in panamá city 1.00
be high in city 1.00
be in city 0.91
be in new city 0.88
be expensive in city 0.85
be in city expensive 0.85
be to high 0.85
be in new city expensive 0.84
be expensive in new city 0.84
is high 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(price, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rent, be high in city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(price, is high)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(price, is high)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fee, be to high)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fee, is high)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(price, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fee, be to high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fee, be to high)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fee, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fee, is high)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rent, be high in city)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(rent, be high in panamá city)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rent, be high in panamá city)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in panamá city)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in panamá city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rent, be in city)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rent, be high in city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(price, is high)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fee, is high)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fee, be to high)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rent, be high in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(price, is high)