rent: be expensive in city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in city 1.00
be in city expensive 1.00
be in new city expensive 0.96
be expensive in new city 0.96
be in city 0.89
be in new city 0.87
be high in panamá city 0.85
be high in city 0.85
is expensive 0.85
get expensive 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(payment, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sum, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sum, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(payment, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rent, be expensive in city)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rent, be expensive in new city)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rent, be in city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(rent, be high in panamá city)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(payment, is expensive)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sum, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(payment, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rent, be expensive in city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sum, is expensive)