rent: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
get expensive 0.94
be expensive in city 0.85
be in city expensive 0.85
be in new city expensive 0.84
be expensive in new city 0.84
be comparatively cheaper than buying 0.80
be in regina expensive 0.79
be on pc expensive 0.77
be more expensive in canada 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rent, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rent, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(price, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rent, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(payment, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sum, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(price, be more expensive in canada)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sum, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(payment, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(price, be more expensive in canada)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rent, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(payment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rent, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(price, be more expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rent, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rent, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(rent, be expensive in city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(rent, be expensive in new city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in new city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in new city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in new city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rent, be comparatively cheaper than buying)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rent, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rent, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(payment, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sum, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(price, be more expensive in canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(payment, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sum, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(rent, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(price, be more expensive in canada)