report: have impact on game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents analysis
Weight: 0.67
, evidence
Weight: 0.66
, study
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
Siblings article
Weight: 0.73
, opinion
Weight: 0.66
, publication
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.63
, release
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
have impact on game 1.00
have bigger impact on game 0.94
have impact 0.90
be on game 0.85
have bigger impact 0.84
be in game 0.84
play part in history 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(opinion, be on game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(opinion, play part in history)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(opinion, be on game)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(opinion, be on game)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(opinion, play part in history)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(opinion, play part in history)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(report, have impact on game)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(report, have impact)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(report, have impact)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact on game)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(report, be in game)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(report, be in game)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(report, have impact)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(report, be in game)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(report, have bigger impact on game)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(report, have bigger impact on game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(report, have impact)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(report, have bigger impact on game)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(report, be in game)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(report, have bigger impact)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(report, have bigger impact)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(report, have bigger impact)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(report, have bigger impact)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(report, have impact on game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(report, have impact on game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(opinion, be on game)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(report, have impact on game)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(opinion, play part in history)