representative: be appointed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.67
, officer
Weight: 0.67
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.62
Siblings manager
Weight: 0.68
, observer
Weight: 0.59
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, family member
Weight: 0.37
, vice president
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be appointed 1.00
be elected 0.80
be elected in country 0.76
be elected into office 0.76
be elected two years 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(member, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(representative, be appointed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(member, be elected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(representative, be appointed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(member, be appointed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(member, be elected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(member, be appointed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(member, be elected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(vice president, be elected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(member, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(representative, be appointed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(member, be elected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(representative, be appointed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(vice president, be elected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(vice president, be elected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(representative, be appointed)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(representative, be elected)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(representative, be elected)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected into office)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected in country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(representative, be elected in country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(representative, be elected two years)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(representative, be elected in country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(representative, be elected two years)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected in country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(representative, be elected into office)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(representative, be elected into office)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected two years)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(representative, be elected two years)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(representative, be elected into office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(representative, be appointed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(representative, be appointed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(member, be appointed)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(member, be elected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(vice president, be elected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(member, be appointed)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(representative, be appointed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(member, be elected)