representative: have 2 year terms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.67
, officer
Weight: 0.67
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.62
Siblings manager
Weight: 0.68
, observer
Weight: 0.59
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, family member
Weight: 0.37
, vice president
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have 2 year terms 1.00
have terms 0.88
have different terms 0.86
serve 2 years 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(representative, have 2 year terms)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(representative, have terms)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(representative, have terms)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(representative, have different terms)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(representative, have different terms)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(representative, have different terms)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(representative, have terms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(representative, serve 2 years)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(representative, serve 2 years)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(representative, serve 2 years)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(representative, serve 2 years)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(representative, have different terms)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(representative, have terms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(representative, have 2 year terms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(representative, have 2 year terms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(representative, have 2 year terms)