representative: were in house

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.67
, officer
Weight: 0.67
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.62
Siblings manager
Weight: 0.68
, observer
Weight: 0.59
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, family member
Weight: 0.37
, vice president
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were in house 1.00
were to house 1.00
be in house 0.95
were in house chosen 0.88
were in house originally chosen 0.83
were to house of burgesses 0.83
were at versailles 0.79
be in house of representatives 0.79
were to house of burgesses chosen 0.79
be selected for house 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(officer, be in house)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(representative, were in house)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(member, be in house of representatives)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(representative, were in house)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(officer, be in house)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(member, be in house of representatives)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(officer, be in house)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(member, be in house of representatives)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(officer, be in house)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(representative, were in house)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(member, be in house of representatives)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(representative, were in house)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(representative, were in house)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(representative, be in house)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(representative, be in house)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(representative, be in house)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to house)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(representative, were to house)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(representative, be in house)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(representative, were to house)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to house of burgesses)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house chosen)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(representative, were in house chosen)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(representative, be selected for house)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house originally chosen)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(representative, were to house)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(representative, be selected for house)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(representative, were in house chosen)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to house of burgesses chosen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(representative, were to house of burgesses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(representative, were in house originally chosen)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(representative, were in house chosen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(representative, be in house of representatives)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(representative, be selected for house)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(representative, were to house of burgesses chosen)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(representative, be in house of representatives)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(representative, were to house of burgesses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(representative, were at versailles)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(representative, were at versailles)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(representative, be in house of representatives)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(representative, were in house originally chosen)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(representative, be selected for house)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(representative, were to house of burgesses chosen)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(representative, were at versailles)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(representative, were at versailles)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(representative, were in house originally chosen)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(representative, were to house of burgesses chosen)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(representative, were to house of burgesses)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(representative, be in house of representatives)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(representative, were in house)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(officer, be in house)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(member, be in house of representatives)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(officer, be in house)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(representative, were in house)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(member, be in house of representatives)