representative: were to convention

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.67
, officer
Weight: 0.67
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.62
Siblings manager
Weight: 0.68
, observer
Weight: 0.59
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, family member
Weight: 0.37
, vice president
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were to convention 1.00
were to convention chosen 0.94
were to constitutional convention 0.90
were to constitutional convention chosen 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(representative, were to convention)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(representative, were to constitutional convention chosen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to convention)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(representative, were to convention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(representative, were to convention)