retriever: look like

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, work
Weight: 0.42
, water
Weight: 0.37
, animal
Weight: 0.34
Siblings golden retriever
Weight: 0.78
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.41
, beagle
Weight: 0.37
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, dachshund
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
look like 1.00
look different 0.91
look sad 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look different)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(beagle, look sad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beagle, look like)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(golden retriever, look like)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(golden retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(golden retriever, look like)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(beagle, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(beagle, look like)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, look different)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, look sad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(beagle, look sad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(beagle, look sad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(retriever, look like)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(retriever, look different)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(retriever, look different)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(retriever, look different)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(retriever, look sad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(retriever, look sad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(retriever, look sad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look different)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look sad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(retriever, look like)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(golden retriever, look like)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, look sad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, look different)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beagle, look like)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(retriever, look like) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beagle, look sad)