rhetoric: be considered art

Related concepts

Parents	discipline Weight: 0.61 , subject Weight: 0.59 , art Weight: 0.58 , thing Weight: 0.57 , topic Weight: 0.57
Siblings	politics Weight: 0.34 , hyperbole Weight: 0.33 , ideology Weight: 0.33 , agenda Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered art	1.00
is art	0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(art, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(rhetoric, be considered art)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(art, is art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(rhetoric, be considered art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(art, be considered art)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(art, is art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(art, be considered art)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(art, is art)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered art)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(politics, is art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(art, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(art, is art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(politics, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(politics, be considered art)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(politics, is art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(politics, is art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(rhetoric, be considered art)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(rhetoric, is art)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(rhetoric, is art)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(rhetoric, is art)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(rhetoric, be considered art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(art, be considered art)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(art, is art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(politics, be considered art)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(politics, is art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(art, be considered art)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(art, is art)