politics: be considered art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sphere
Weight: 0.69
, matter
Weight: 0.65
, realm
Weight: 0.65
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
Siblings culture
Weight: 0.35
, dark matter
Weight: 0.34
, rhetoric
Weight: 0.34
, grey matter
Weight: 0.33
, theology
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered art 1.00
is art 0.93
be art of possible 0.89
be art of government 0.85
be considered science 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, is art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(politics, be considered art)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(politics, is art)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(politics, is art)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(politics, is art)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(politics, be art of possible)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(politics, be art of possible)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(politics, be art of government)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(politics, is art)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(politics, be considered science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(politics, be art of possible)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(politics, be considered science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(politics, be art of government)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(politics, be considered science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(politics, be art of possible)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(politics, be art of government)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(politics, be art of government)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(politics, be considered art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rhetoric, is art)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be considered art)