rhetoric: is art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, art
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings politics
Weight: 0.34
, hyperbole
Weight: 0.33
, ideology
Weight: 0.33
, agenda
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is art 1.00
be considered art 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(art, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rhetoric, is art)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(art, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rhetoric, is art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(art, is art)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(art, be considered art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(art, is art)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(art, be considered art)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(politics, be considered art)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(politics, is art)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(art, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, is art)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(art, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, is art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(politics, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(politics, is art)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(politics, be considered art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(politics, be considered art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(rhetoric, is art)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, be considered art)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(rhetoric, be considered art)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(rhetoric, be considered art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rhetoric, be considered art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(rhetoric, is art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(art, is art)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be considered art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(politics, is art)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(politics, be considered art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(art, is art)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(rhetoric, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(art, be considered art)