richmond: has quality service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.63
, city
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
, suburb
Weight: 0.56
Siblings springfield
Weight: 0.35
, sheffield
Weight: 0.35
, newport
Weight: 0.35
, norfolk
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality service 1.00
is full service 0.87
has quality good 0.81
has quality news 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality service)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality service)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality service)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(suburb, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality service)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(city, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality news)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(newport, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality service)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality service)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality service)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(suburb, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality service)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(newport, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(newport, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(richmond, has quality service)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(richmond, is full service)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(richmond, is full service)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(richmond, is full service)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(richmond, is full service)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(richmond, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(richmond, has quality news)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality news)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality news)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality news)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality service)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(newport, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality service)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality news)