suburb: has quality service

Related concepts

Parents	place Weight: 0.61 , neighborhood Weight: 0.60 , city Weight: 0.59 , community Weight: 0.57 , region Weight: 0.54
Siblings	richmond Weight: 0.56 , south park Weight: 0.34 , greenwich village Weight: 0.34 , city hall Weight: 0.33 , quebec city Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality service	1.00
service	0.92
has quality good	0.81
has quality news	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(suburb, has quality service)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(community, service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(suburb, has quality service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(community, service)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(community, service)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality news)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality service)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(community, service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality service)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality service)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(richmond, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(richmond, has quality news) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality news)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(south park, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(south park, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(suburb, has quality service)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(suburb, service)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(suburb, service)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(suburb, service)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(suburb, service)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(suburb, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(suburb, has quality news)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality news)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality news)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(suburb, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(suburb, has quality news)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(suburb, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(community, service)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(city, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(richmond, has quality service)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(richmond, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(richmond, has quality news)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(south park, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(community, service)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(suburb, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(city, has quality good)