suburb: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, neighborhood
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, community
Weight: 0.57
, region
Weight: 0.54
Siblings richmond
Weight: 0.56
, south park
Weight: 0.34
, greenwich village
Weight: 0.34
, city hall
Weight: 0.33
, quebec city
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality service 0.81
has quality news 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(south park, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality service)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(richmond, has quality news)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(richmond, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(south park, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(south park, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(richmond, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality service)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(richmond, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(richmond, has quality news)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(suburb, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(suburb, has quality service)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality service)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality service)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality news)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(suburb, has quality news)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(suburb, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(suburb, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality definition)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(suburb, has quality definition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality news)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality service)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(suburb, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(suburb, has quality definition)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(suburb, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality news)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(suburb, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality service)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(richmond, has quality news)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(south park, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(suburb, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(city, has quality good)